Leute mal Hand aufs Herz , ich sehe doch bisher an jedem Multititel welche Konsole die bessere Grafik bietet , alle zeitgleich erscheinenden Multititel sind auf der Xbox360 besser , sei es NFS Carbon , Tony Hawks 8 , CoD3 und Co... habt Ihr die Testberichte vergessen ?
Zudem zeigen ausnahmetitel wie Gears of War wer die Grafikhosen anhat..
Nochmal hier auszüge aus Tests..
Need for Speed: Carbon PS3 Review
Carbon doesn't look any better on the PS3 than on the 360. If anything, it looks a very tiny bit worse; up-close textures sometimes appear slightly muddy in comparison. The difference is minor enough to not really matter -- just don't expect any improvement over what you've already seen on the 360. And, like most of the PS3 launch games, Carbon doesn't run in 1080p.
Strangely, the PS3 version also is missing the 360's photo mode. On the 360 you can pause midrace, pan around, and take a shot of the action, but that option is gone in this version. Not a big deal to us, but there it is.
---------
COD3 PS3 vs Xbox360
Based on criteria like this, it's hard to imagine COD not impressing. After all, it sounds exciting, so where are all the pitfalls? Unfortunately, they can be found everywhere... especially if you've played the Xbox 360 version released earlier in the year. A quick comparison reveals those differences right off the bat. Be it with multiplayer options and online capabilities (360 has a point system and voice support, PS3 doesn't), or the visuals (Xbox moves at a smoother framerate with few hitches, while the PS3 version stutters often and boasts a more "washed out" color palette).
---------------
Dieser Abschnitt sollte reichen:
So we finally got the Resistance demo done after playing Gears of war, and, it sucked it comparison. The graphics were muddy (in most places) where the textures just weren't there, the controls on the PS3 controller were just bad, as i've heard that FPSs were on the playstation controllers, and the enemies were just stupid. I could shoot them from a distance and they wouldn't know what was going on, so'd they jump a bit and stand there again. Overall, Resistance felt clunky, terrible controls, average graphics, and bad AI. I don't know if the Online would be any better. The guns were pretty cool though
-----------------
Und hier :
PS3 Vs Xbox 360 - A Game Developer's View
Zitat:
Being a video game developer (I develop for both, Playstation 3 and XBOX 360) people ask me almost daily which platform I think is better. These are my personal feelings, in no way does this reflect my employer.
Short answer: XBOX 360.
Performance: On paper<----, the PS3 is more powerful. In reality, its quite inferior to the 360. Without getting into too many details, the three general-purpose CPUs the xbox360 has are currently FAR easier to take advantage of than the SPUs on the PS3. I suspect a few years down the road some high budget, first party PS3 exclusive titles will come out that really take advantage of the SPUs and do things the XBOX 360 cant, but I dont think the console is worth buying based on this speculation (for some it will be though, we'll have to wait and see how these games turn out).
Graphics: The XBOX 360 is a clear winner. The GPU is more powerful. It has more powerful fillrate, and far more pixel and vertex processing horsepower. Part of the reason is their choice of memory, and architecture of pixel and vertex procesing. I cant get into details but the same vertex shader will run much slower on the PS3 than the XBOX 360. The 360 also has a clever new way rendering high definition anti aliased back buffers. To accomplish the same effect on PS3 is prohibitively expensive. For this reason I think many games will have no choice but to run in non-HD resolutions on the PS3 version, use a lower quality anti aliasing technique, or do back buffer upscaling. The end result in all cases is going to be noticeably worse image quality.
der rest ist Hier :
http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-348-1.htm
------
Ars Technica hat sich die PS3 mal zu genüte geführt und getestet. Das Ergebnis sah so aus:
Endnote: 6/10
The Good:
* The hardware looks great, and runs nearly silently and very cool
* Wireless controller is light and feels great
* Great-looking Blu-ray movie playback
* Price is low for a Bluy-ray player
* A lot of multimedia options
* Solid backwards compatibility
The Bad:
* Terrible online store
* Slow, unituitive browser
* No background downloading
* Games continue to play even if you eject the disc; you have to manually restart the UI via the controller
* Messy UI
* HD scaler doesn't work right
* Price is high for a video game console
* No rumble, controller loses sync with system sometimes; little game support for motion-sensing features
* Uninspired launch lineup
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/ps3.ars
PS: Die Xbox360 hat auf dieser Seite im Test eine 9/10 bekommen , Wii 8/10
Hier mal eine Liste der ersten IGN-PS3-Reviews:
Tiger Woods PGA Tour 07
8,3
Need for Speed Carbon
7,9
Marvel: Ultimate Alliance
7,9
Untold Legends: Dark Kingdom
6,5
NHL 2K7
8,6
Ridge Racer 7
8,2
NBA '07
7,8
Resistance: Fall of Man
9,1
Tony Hawk's Project 8
7,0
Genji: Days of the Blade
6,0
My impression with the Playstation 3, 6 hours of playing.
Zitat:
Oh and for objectivity i should note i have never owned one playstation console.
Not that it really matters.
Just got up from last night, played to around 6 am from 12am. Sorry couldn't get any pics or vids in, but it definitely is a looker. Honestly i can say i do like the design of the PS3 more than the 360, it just seems more bad ass no lie. Does that make it a better console?: before we could even start playing we had to wait atleast 15 minutes for an update to download and install, then take the time to hold down on the joystick and read an extremely long license agreement. (It scrolls down fast enough so you can read it...) Then we try the internet browser, it's pretty cool but feels clunky, considering you have to scroll around to see the entire web page, you're constantly trying to find things. But, i must say it gets the job done. On to the Playstation store, it is about as easy as the market place to use, and all demos were free. Downloading the Motorstorm / Resistance demos took atleast an hour each, so we ended up hooking my 360 downstairs to play gears of war while we waited. Oh yes, i forgot, before we go on to the games, the menus. They just suck, you'll be reading and flipping through different text before you play any game, because in order to make an online account you must give them almost everything you know about yourself. And then some.
The menus just look ugly to, there isn't any color on the PS3 it seems, except for black and white, and along with the wierd web browser on the PS3 the 'keyboard text' program you have to use is just annoying to run through, because instead of giving you just the entire alphabet to run through instead they list say -abcde- in the same group and then you click that group, then pick wich letter you want from that group. Then go back to pick from another group, and so on. It's a hassle. Overall with menus/updates and even the starting menu all seem confusing and ugly, and it seems like the console REALLY wasn't made for kids under 13.
So we finally got the Resistance demo done after playing Gears of war, and, it sucked it comparison. The graphics were muddy (in most places) where the textures just weren't there, the controls on the PS3 controller were just bad, as i've heard that FPSs were on the playstation controllers, and the enemies were just stupid. I could shoot them from a distance and they wouldn't know what was going on, so'd they jump a bit and stand there again. Overall, Resistance felt clunky, terrible controls, average graphics, and bad AI. I don't know if the Online would be any better. The guns were pretty cool though.
Motorstorm was a great, the gameplay was fun, and the graphics were amazing - really next gen. The controls felt right, and did i mention the graphics are really good? Still, nothing better than say PGR3. It really does seem like Motorstorm and Resistance would have been a little better with rumble though, you do blow up, jump off ledges, fire weapons, and expect to feel rumble. And it just wasn't there. The motion sensors did work well in Motorstorm though, and it did feel fun. Overall one of the better PS3 games, but still nothing really better than what the 360 offers.
So the Playstation 3 has an average or below average menu setup, the playstation store isn't anything better than the xbox live market place, or in some cases worse: you can't download something and flip around without canceling, or play a game. The graphics were a mixed bag, thers no doubt the PS3 can handle anything the 360 pushes out, but so far Resistance isn't showing off anything next gen, and when we played Genji (wich i forgot to say), it wasn't either, but Motorstorm looked amazing. The controller sucks, feel wierd without rumble and because it's light, and the controls for FPS (atleast with Resistance) were just bad. We didn't get to try the PS3 on an HDTV, wich i should note, but i don't think it would have helped, and we didn't get to see the Blue-ray player in action with the movie. The touch sensative start up button was cool. I'd give the PS3 a B for now, while i'd give the 360 an A in comparison. Wait for the PS3 for now, unless you really want the games.
