Zero Tolerance Der Nahe Osten und seine politische Situation

ZT Pin

Ihr befindet euch in einem ZT-Thread, entsprechend gelten hier folgende extra Regeln(Sonderregeln ggf. im Startpost sind mitzubeachten):

1) ZTF für Zero Tolerance Forums Provokationen/Beleidigungen/Bashes/Trollen/OffTopic/Spam/etc führen zur sofortigen Bestrafung in Form von Bans. Entscheidungen sind endgültig und nicht diskutierbar.

2) Gepflegte Diskussionskultur ist das Gebot! ZTFs koexistieren neben den normalen Foren. Wenn ihr mit den harten Regeln hier nicht klarkommt, nutzt die normal moderierten Foren.

3) Einwanderungspolitik und Forderungen diesbezüglich sind nicht Teil des Threads und werden entsprechend behandelt. Davon nicht betroffen sind die Reaktionen von Muslimen hierzulande auf die Vorkommnisse, wie z.B. Pro-Palästina Demonstrationen.

4) Bei kurzen Clips oder Videos, welche bewusst durch vermeintlich unangebrachtes Verhalten Stimmung machen oder Empörung auslösen sollen, bedarf es einer Einordnung in den Kontext der eigenen Argumentation.

5) Benutzt bitte Spoiler-Kästen und benennt diese entsprechend, wenn ihr besonders grausame Darstellungen, Fotos sowie Videos postet.

Das Thema ist unglaublich emotionalisiert. Das bestimmte Randgruppen in die radikale Irrationalität abdriften, empfinde ich in dem Fall eher als Hilfeschrei.
Selbstverständlich ist das ein „Hilfeschrei“. Aber bevor man diesen Leuten zu Hilfe eilt, sollte man schon sehr genau fragen wer da schreit und welche Ziele damit verfolgt werden. Entsprechend unterschiedlich kann die angemessene Reaktion ausfallen. Reminder: Auch am 07. Oktober gab es einen „Hilfeschrei“. Dem Ruf von Hamas sind damals Hisbollah im Libanon und Houthis im Jemen militärisch gefolgt. UN, Menschenrechtsorganisationen, Studenten, sowie weite Teile westlicher Medien und Kommentatoren haben sich seitdem einem beispiellosen Informationskrieg gegen Israel angeschlossen. Zum jüngsten Aufmarsch vor der israelischen Botschaft hat Andreas Büttner, Antisemitismusbeauftragter von Brandenburg, folgendes festgestellt:


Falls Büttner mit seiner Einschätzung Recht behält, sind es vielleicht weniger die Protestierenden selbst welche der Aufklärung am dringendsten bedürfen, sondern zuvorderst die Öffentlichkeit über die Agenda solcher Proteste. In den USA ist man inzwischen schon etwas weiter was die politische Bereitschaft angeht die entsprechende Aufklärungsarbeit voranzutreiben:

 
Wenn inzwischen 100.000 Soldaten den Dienst in Israel verweigern, erscheinen die Menschenrechtsverletzungen im Gazastreifen und im Westjordanland in einem anderen Licht. In diesem Fall bleibt zwangsläufig nur ein bestimmter Typ Mensch zurück, der die Gewaltdynamik und routinemäßigen Kriegsverbrechen in Gaza inzwischen sehr gut erklärt. Schickt man eine Mischung aus "normalen" Personen sowie solchen mit psychopathischen oder sadistischen Neigungen in ein Kriegsgebiet, bilden die normalen Menschen möglicherweise eine Hemmschwelle, die den anderen das Begehen von Kriegsverbrechen erschwert. Fallen diese "normalen" Menschen jedoch weg, sinkt zwangsläufig diese Hemmschwelle. Kriegsverbrechen müssen nicht zwingend explizit befohlen werden, es reicht bereits aus, ein entsprechendes Umfeld zu schaffen, in dem sich solche Verbrechen von selbst entfalten.

Doch was geschieht, wenn der Krieg vorüber ist? Wenn Menschen aus diesem Umfeld in die Gesellschaft zurückkehren? Ist es nicht naheliegend, dass diese Menschen dann versuchen könnten, die übrige Gesellschaft nach ihren eigenen, korrumpierten Maßstäben umzuformen? Ich sehe was die politische Kultur Israels angeht schwarz.
 


original__350x525__mobile__scale_2
 
It was not until 31 March, after the last bodies had been pulled from the grave, that the Israeli military (IDF) commented on the attack.

Numerous claims made in that statement, and in statements since, have not stood up to scrutiny.

IDF claim: The vehicles had their lights off

What we know: The vehicles' lights were on


The IDF's initial statement claimed Israeli troops had opened fire on the convoy because it was "advancing suspiciously toward IDF troops without headlights or emergency signals".

The video taken by Rifaat, which emerged on 4 April, disproved this claim, showing that all vehicles had their lights on. The IDF subsequently retracted the claim, blaming false testimony from the soldiers involved.

The vehicles are also clearly marked in the video with humanitarian symbols, and all workers appear to be in uniform.

The doctor who carried out the post-mortem examinations, Dr Ahmed Dahair, tells Sky News that "all of them were wearing their official uniforms".

IDF claim: The vehicles lacked necessary permissions to travel in a combat zone

What we know: The area was not declared a combat zone until four-and-a-half hours after the attack


The IDF has also justified the decision to open fire by saying the vehicles were "uncoordinated" - meaning their movements were not approved in advance by the IDF.

Speaking to Sky News, however, senior officials from the UN, PRCS and Civil Defence say coordination was not required because the area had not been declared a combat zone.

"It was a safe area and does not require coordination," says Mohammed Abu Mosahba, director of ambulance and emergency services at PRCS.

As Sky News reported on 3 April, an evacuation order for the area was only issued at 8.31am, almost four-and-a-half hours after the first ambulance was attacked.
Israeli forces did conduct a major operation in the area that morning, but Sky News found no evidence that IDF vehicles were nearby before the attacks took place.

Satellite imagery from 10.48am on the day of the incident shows a large number of vehicles near the site of the attack, and tracks connecting them with a building 1.1km to the west, indicating that this is where the vehicles came from.
IDF claim: Israeli troops did not fire from a close distance

What we know: Some shots were fired from as close as 12m


In a 5 April briefing to journalists, the IDF said there was "no firing from close distance" during the incident, and that this is backed up by aerial surveillance footage. The IDF is yet to release this footage.

However, as Sky News revealed on 9 April, expert analysis of the audio in Rifaat's recording shows some of the shots fired at the medics came from as little as 12m away.

Dr Ahmed, the pathologist who carried out the post-mortem examinations, said his team were unable to determine whether the shots were fired from close range because the bodies arrived in an "advanced state of decomposition".

IDF claim: The victims did not have their hands or feet tied together

What we know: There is no evidence to suggest the victims were restrained before being killed


Representatives of PRCS and Civil Defence, as well as a doctor who saw the bodies, have said that at least one victim was found with their hands or legs tied together - claims that Israel has denied.

Photos shared with Sky News and other media outlets as evidence of this claim do show a black plastic tie around one victim's wrist. Attached to the tie is an empty white information card.
IDF claim: The vehicles were crushed by accident as they were moved off the road

What we know: The vehicles were only crushed after they had been moved off the road


The IDF has said the bodies were buried in order to protect them from wild animals, and that the vehicles were crushed inadvertently while being moved out of the road. It has not explained why the vehicles were buried.


Satellite imagery from the hours after the attack, however, shows that by 10.48am five vehicles had already been moved off to the side of the road but had not yet been crushed - directly contradicting the IDF's account.

The illustration below is based on satellite imagery seen by Sky News.
IDF claim: The convoy included 'Hamas terrorists'

What we know: There is no evidence anyone in the convoy was a militant


The IDF says "at least six" of those killed were "Hamas terrorists", though it hasn't alleged that any were armed.

No evidence has been provided to support this claim, and there are no indications in Rifaat's video that any of the aid workers were combatants or had ties with Hamas.

Conflict monitoring organisation Airwars told Sky News it had conducted a thorough search of the victims' social media history and was unable to find any evidence linking them to militant groups, though it emphasised that online information "can only ever provide a partial picture".

The IDF has only specifically named one of these alleged Hamas operatives, Mohammad Amin Ibrahim Shubaki.

However, this person has not been named as a victim of the attack by the UN, PRCS or Civil Defence.

There is no publicly available evidence that he had ties to any of these organisations, or to Hamas, or that he is dead.

IDF claim: The original ambulance contained three Hamas police officers

What we know: There is no evidence any of these three were militants


The IDF says that all three people in the original ambulance, which Rifaat's team were searching for, were "Hamas police".

No evidence has been provided for this claim either. Two of the men, Mustafa Khalaja and Ezz El-Din Shaat, were killed, while one, Munther Abed, was detained and later released.

Sky News reviewed social media profiles, identified by Airwars, for the two men who were killed. We found no evidence that either was affiliated with Hamas.

Ezz El-Din was photographed at a hospital wearing a PRCS uniform in October 2023, He was later pictured in February 2024 lifting an injured person out of a PRCS ambulance in Rafah.
Mustafa, meanwhile, had extensively documented his paramedic career online in photos dating back to 2011.

In one post, his young son is pictured at the wheel of a PRCS ambulance. "Mohammed insists on visiting me at work and sharing my working hours with patients," he wrote.
'It all points to a cover-up'

"This looks like a dreadful war crime," says Sir Geoffrey Nice KC, who served as lead prosecutor in the genocide trial of former Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic at The Hague.

"The [use] of a bulldozer to bury the bodies of the 15 people and their vehicles and the change of official accounts given by Israel all... points to a cover-up."
Speaking to Sky News, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert said: "The way it's been described in the first place, the original reaction by the Israeli army, the then subsequent corrections made, all points to something very, very disturbing."

Sky's Alex Crawford asked Olmert whether the evidence pointed to a cover-up. "I don't know, but I don't feel comfortable," he said.
Geoffrey Nice says that legal culpability for the killing of the 15 aid workers could rest with the soldiers involved, or with people higher up the command chain.

"You don't do at the bottom what you fear will not be supported by people at the top," he says. "Why would you? The risk is too great."

When she heard that there had been an Israeli operation overnight in Rafah, Rifaat's mother Hajjah wasn't worried - she had faith that her son's status as a humanitarian worker would protect him.

Her main concern was whether, during all the inevitable call-outs, he would have time to eat or drink.

"We did not fear for his safety at all."
 
In Gaza regt sich vermehrt offener Widerstand gegen den Missbrauch geschützter ziviler Infrastruktur für militärische Zwecke (=Kriegsverbrechen) durch Hamas. Welche wie üblich mit Einschüchterung und Mord reagiert.


Es liegt auf der Hand, dass insbesondere die militärische Nutzung medizinischer Einrichtungen und Fahrzeuge die Wahrscheinlichkeit für israelischen Beschuss erheblich erhöht. Zum aktuellen Zwischenfall hat die IDF gestern die Ergebnisse ihrer internen Untersuchung veröffentlicht. Die Kernpunkte:

1. Der Verdacht auf Kriegsverbrechen konnte nicht erhärtet werden. Eingeräumt wurden operative Fehler, Verstöße gegen militärische Protokolle und unvollständige bzw. falsche erste Angaben durch am Vorfall beteiligte Soldaten. Entsprechend wurden disziplinarische Maßnahmen eingeleitet.

2. Die Fahrzeuge wurden gezielt unter Beschuss genommen. Andere Fahrzeuge konnten die Stelle im fraglichen Zeitraum problemlos passieren. D.h. die Soldaten haben nicht einfach wahllos auf alles geschossen, sondern haben Unterscheidungen vorgenommen.

3. Grund für den Beschuss war nicht kriminelle Intention, sondern ein Bedrohungsgefühl weil die Soldaten irrtümlicherweise von Hamas-Terroristen ausgingen. Auf welcher Dynamik diese Fehleinschätzung nach Einschätzung der Untersuchung basiert, wird in diesem Artikel der Times of Israel genauer beschrieben.

Der Vorwurf von Kriegsverbrechen ist damit allerdings noch nicht vom Tisch. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung wurden an den militärischen Generalstaatsanwalt weitergeleitet, der nun entscheidet ob noch weiter und umfangreicher juristisch ermittelt wird. Kritisch ist insbesondere der Beschuss des zuletzt am Ort des Geschehens eintreffenden UNWRA-Fahrzeugs.

Was gegen Kriegsverbrechen spricht, ist die Festnahme und spätere Freilassung potenzieller Zeugen durch die Soldaten. Und dass eben Unterscheidungen getroffen wurden und damit offenkundig Abwägungen stattfanden. Aus juristischer Sicht ist nunmehr die entscheidende Frage ob die Soldaten ernsthaft glaubten auf Hamas Terroristen zu schießen oder nicht. Wenn nein, war es ein Kriegsverbrechen. Wenn ja, war es keines.

Erwähnenswert ist noch der Umstand, dass die Untersuchung zwar bestätigen konnte, dass 6 der Getöteten Hamas-Terroristen gewesen sind. Die Untersuchungskommission das aber nicht zugunsten der Soldaten gewertet hat, da dies den Soldaten beim Eröffnen des Feuers nicht bekannt war. Es hat sich erst im Nachhinein so herausgestellt und war somit eine „zufällige“* Koinzidenz und kein rechtfertigender Umstand. Das spricht für die Objektivität der Untersuchung.

*Zufällig nur in Anführungszeichen (s. obige Tweets)

Wenn inzwischen 100.000 Soldaten den Dienst in Israel verweigern, erscheinen die Menschenrechtsverletzungen im Gazastreifen und im Westjordanland in einem anderen Licht. In diesem Fall bleibt zwangsläufig nur ein bestimmter Typ Mensch zurück, der die Gewaltdynamik und routinemäßigen Kriegsverbrechen in Gaza inzwischen sehr gut erklärt. Schickt man eine Mischung aus "normalen" Personen sowie solchen mit psychopathischen oder sadistischen Neigungen in ein Kriegsgebiet, bilden die normalen Menschen möglicherweise eine Hemmschwelle, die den anderen das Begehen von Kriegsverbrechen erschwert. Fallen diese "normalen" Menschen jedoch weg, sinkt zwangsläufig diese Hemmschwelle. Kriegsverbrechen müssen nicht zwingend explizit befohlen werden, es reicht bereits aus, ein entsprechendes Umfeld zu schaffen, in dem sich solche Verbrechen von selbst entfalten.

Doch was geschieht, wenn der Krieg vorüber ist? Wenn Menschen aus diesem Umfeld in die Gesellschaft zurückkehren? Ist es nicht naheliegend, dass diese Menschen dann versuchen könnten, die übrige Gesellschaft nach ihren eigenen, korrumpierten Maßstäben umzuformen? Ich sehe was die politische Kultur Israels angeht schwarz.
Wenn Du bei israelischen Soldaten als Wiedergänger mit Netanjahu als Nachtkönig angekommen bist, sag Bescheid. Dann hätte Deine anti-israelische Propaganda zwar immer noch keinen Informations- aber immerhin gewissen Unterhaltungswert.
 
Im Dezember sprach Franziskus von seinem Schmerz, den er empfinde, wann immer er an das Leid im Gazastreifen denke, "an solche Grausamkeiten, an das maschinelle Abschlachten von Kindern, an die Bombardierung von Schulen und Krankenhäusern... Wie viel Grausamkeit!". Im darauffolgenden Monat nannte er die anhaltende humanitäre Krise "beschämend".
 

Am Mittwoch präsentierte Deutsch gemeinsam mit IKG-Generalsekretär Benjamin Nägele den Jahresbericht 2024 der Antisemitismus-Meldestelle der IKG.


Und das Vorjahr brachte "einen neuen, traurigen Negativ-Rekord", wie Deutsch festhielt. "Mehr als vier bestätigte Vorfälle wurden jeden Tag gemeldet. Ich will gar nicht wissen, wie viele nicht gemeldet wurden."

Jüdische Schüler, die mit Schimpfwörtern wie "Saujud" oder Parolen wie "Free Palestine!" zu Boden geworfen werden; ältere jüdische Menschen, die am Schabbat zur Synagoge gehen - und angegriffen werden; oder offensichtlich jüdische Österreicher, denen der Schtreimel (Kopfbedeckung, Anm.) vom Kopf geschlagen wird: Insgesamt 1.250 Vorfälle hat die Meldestelle im Vorjahr dokumentiert; das sind um fast ein Drittel (32,5 %) mehr als noch 2023, das bereits im Eindruck des Terrors vom 7. Oktober stand.
 
Israeli strikes on the Gaza Strip killed at least 14 Palestinians, mostly women and children, and destroyed bulldozers and other heavy equipment that had been supplied by mediators to clear rubble. A separate strike in Lebanon on Tuesday killed a member of a local group.

Israel's 18-month offensive against Hamas has destroyed vast areas of Gaza, raising fears that much of it may never be rebuilt. The territory already had a shortage of heavy equipment, which is also needed to rescue people from the rubble after Israeli strikes and to clear vital roads.

A municipality in the Jabaliya area of northern Gaza said a strike on its parking garage destroyed nine bulldozers provided by Egypt and Qatar, which helped broker the ceasefire that took hold in January. Israel ended the truce last month, renewing its bombardment and ground operations and sealing the territory's 2 million Palestinians off from all imports, including food, fuel and medical supplies.

The strikes also destroyed a water tanker and a mobile generator provided by aid groups, and a truck used to pump sewage, the Jabaliya al-Nazla municipality said.

There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military on the strikes. The military says it only targets fighters and blames civilian deaths on Hamas because the group operates in densely populated areas.

Israeli strikes kill 14, mostly children

An Israeli airstrike early Tuesday destroyed a multistory home in the southern city of Khan Younis, killing nine people, including four women and four children, according to Nasser Hospital, which received the bodies. The dead included a 2-year-old girl and her parents.

“They were asleep, sleeping in God’s peace. They had nothing to do with anything,” said Awad Dahliz, the slain girl's grandfather. “What is the fault of this innocent child?”

A separate strike in the built-up Jabaliya refugee camp killed three children and their parents, according to the Gaza Health Ministry's emergency service.

Israel's air and ground war has killed over 51,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to the ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. Israel says it has killed around 20,000 fighters, without providing evidence.

The war began when Hamas-led gunmen attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 people hostage. They are still holding 59 hostages, 24 of whom are believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals.

Hamas has said it will only free the remaining hostages in return for the release of Palestinian prisoners, a full Israeli withdrawal and a lasting ceasefire. Israel has said it will keep fighting until the hostages are returned and Hamas has been either destroyed or disarmed and sent into exile. It has pledged to hold onto so-called security zones in Gaza indefinitely.

An Israeli airstrike on a school sheltering displaced families in northern Gaza killed at least 10 people, while another hit a children's hospital, local health authorities said, taking Wednesday's death toll to 20.
Medics said the airstrike on the Yaffa School in the Tuffah area of Gaza City set fire to tents and classrooms. There has been no Israeli comment on the school attack.
Some furniture was still in flames several hours after the strike as people sifted through blackened classrooms and the schoolyard in search of their belongings, Reuters reported.
“We were sleeping and suddenly something exploded, we started looking and found the whole school on fire, the tents here and there were on fire, everything was on fire," said eyewitness, Um Mohammed Al-Hwaiti.
"People were shouting and men were carrying people, charred (people), charred children, and were walking and saying: ‘Dear God, dear God, we have no one but you.’ What can we say? Dear God, only,” she told Reuters.
Medics said at least 10 other people were killed in separate Israeli strikes across the enclave. Since a January ceasefire collapsed on March 18, Israeli attacks have killed more than 1,600 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health authorities, and hundreds of thousands have been forced from their homes as Israel seized what it calls a buffer zone of Gaza's land.
On Wednesday, the Gaza Health Ministry said an Israeli missile also hit the upper building of the Durra Children's Hospital in Gaza City, damaging the intensive care unit and destroying the solar panel system that feeds the facility with power. No one was killed in the hospital strike.
Gaza's healthcare system is close to collapse due to an Israeli blockade on all supplies to Gaza, including fuel and electricity, since the beginning of March, when it relaunched military operations.
It says the blockade is aimed at pressuring the Hamas militants who run Gaza to release 59 remaining Israeli hostages captured in the October 2023 attacks that precipitated the war. Hamas says it is prepared to free them but only as part of a deal that ends the war.
The health ministry said many Palestinian victims of Israeli military strikes remained trapped under rubble and on the roads, as rescue teams are unable to reach them because of ongoing bombardments. The attacks have also hit dozens of bulldozers and machinery used to clear roads, remove debris and to carry out rescue operations.
The Israeli military said on Tuesday it had hit 40 "engineering vehicles" that were used for "terrorist actions", including Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel.
Some of those heavy vehicles were parked on the road and others inside the garages of municipalities.
“The machinery, because they open the streets and retrieve martyrs from under the houses. For a year now, some people have still not been retrieved from under the rubble," said Gaza man Nasser Mohammed Nasser, standing close to the mangled skeletons of destroyed bulldozers and trucks in Jabalia, in the north of the enclave.
Even before Tuesday's Israeli attack, Palestinians had complained they were short of heavy machinery, accusing Israel of refusing to allow the equipment into Gaza in violation of the January ceasefire deal.

 


Hierzu ein erhellender Haaretz Artikel:
Rumors that something terrible had happened on the way to Rafah's Tel al-Sultan neighborhood began the day after the 15 paramedics and aid workers were killed. But it took another four days before the IDF allowed UN workers and Palestinian rescue crews to reach the site.


The reports and footage from the sandpile in which the 15 people and their vehicles were buried were horrifying.

Contrary to its usual practice, the United Nations released graphic footage of the extraction of the bodies. The IDF quickly responded with what turned out to be a web of alternative facts, or just plain lies, which were refuted one after the other.


First, the army claimed the vehicles had been driving without the emergency lights that mark them as rescue vehicles.

When a video filmed by one of the aid workers who was later killed clearly showed the three vehicles flashing red lights, the IDF recanted and said this was a misunderstanding.

At a briefing two weeks later, the IDF spokesperson's unit said the first vehicle that was hit wasn't an ambulance, but a Hamas police car. It also later retracted that claim.

Another claim that proved incorrect was that nine of the dead were Hamas members. That number later dropped, and now, the IDF only claims that six of them were members of the organization. But it has presented no evidence that links them to Hamas.


Yet another claim presented to the international media was that the area in question was closed to civilian traffic. But the evacuation order for the area was issued only three hours after the incident occurred.
The image seen through this window, amid the smoke, is shocking: IDF soldiers killed 15 unarmed people at close range, as they were driving in well-marked vehicles with flashing lights and wearing orange vests with safety reflectors and blue medical gloves.

One might accept the IDF's explanation that this happened because of a mistake in understanding the operational circumstances or because the force felt threatened. But a simpler explanation can be found in recorded remarks by the commander of the force operating in Tel al-Sultan that night – "everyone you encounter is an enemy. If you see someone, you destroy him."
Yet the true horror isn't the killing of the paramedics, but the truth arising through the smoke from all the windows that have been opened and the accumulated evidence that has emerged from Gaza since the start of the war. There's no reason to think the incidents described above – the three hostages, the World Central Kitchen workers, the Abu Nassar family, the paramedics and dozens of others investigated by every self-respecting Western media outlet – are exceptional.

The Israeli public is like a man who puts his hand in a hat with white and black balls and gets a black one every time he pulls one out, yet keeps being told that all the rest of the tens of thousands of balls in the hat are white and it's just chance that a black ball came up.

Why assume that the killing of the paramedics was worse or occurred in more unusual circumstances than the killing of six people in an airstrike on Deir al-Balah two weeks later? Or the 10 members of a single family killed in Khan Yunis, the 15 members of one family killed in Gaza City's Shujaiyeh neighborhood, the 29 members of another family also killed in Shujaiyeh, or the 37 displaced people killed in a fire following an airstrike on tents in the Al-Muwasi "humanitarian zone" – all incidents from the past 11 days?

Given this accumulation of black balls – the testimonies, the photographs, the investigative reports, the reports by international organizations, the satellite photos and common sense – there's no logic in assuming that the other 30,000 civilians (at least) who were killed in Gaza, died in compliance with Israeli and international law.

On the contrary, all the evidence indicates that in the war that began on October 7, 2023, the IDF loosened all the legal and moral reins on its soldiers and committed too many war crimes to count.

This loosening of reins carries many costs – a prime minister forced to fly circuitous routes to avoid an emergency landing in a country that would extradite him to a jail in the Hague; overt and covert boycotts of Israel's economy, scientific community and high-tech industries; soldiers afraid to land at airports in numerous countries; internal and external violence; the physical and emotional illnesses afflicting soldiers who participated in the war and more.

But the true price is likely to be much higher. And that is the image Israeli society will see reflected in the mirror on the day the smoke dissipates.
 

Briefing ignoriert: Die Truppe wusste, dass auf dieser Strecke Rettungsfahrzeuge unterwegs sein würden und rechnete laut Einsatzbefehl mit keiner Präsenz bewaffneter Hamas-Kämpfer – trotzdem wählte der Offizier den Angriff.

Eigenmächtiges Feuer statt Auftragstreue: Ein Reservist-Offizier der Sayeret Golani macht aus einer verdeckten Beobachtung eine Sturmaktion – erste Salve auf eine Ambulanz mit laufendem Blaulicht.


210 Sekunden Dauerbeschuss: Die Soldaten entleeren mehrere Magazine aus kaum 30 Metern Entfernung auf klar gekennzeichnete Rettungs- und Löschfahrzeuge; Gegenfeuer bleibt aus, Hilferufe verhallen.


Gezielte Nahdistanzschüsse: Sanitäter in Warnwesten, die sich ausweisen, werden regelrecht hingerichtet; zwölf Tote im zweiten Angriff, zwei bereits zuvor.


UN-Wagen als nächstes Ziel: Kurz darauf trifft ein Fahrzeug der Vereinten Nationen ein – auch hier feuert die Truppe, der UNRWA-Mitarbeiter stirbt.


Spurenverwischung am Tatort: Auf Befehl des Brigadekommandeurs werden Leichen und Fahrzeuge verscharrt, um die geplante Offensive auf Tel a-Sultan nicht zu gefährden.


Funklageberichte widerlegt: Der Offizier meldet „unbeleuchtete, verdächtige Fahrzeuge“ – Drohnenbilder zeigen das Gegenteil.


Operationstempo erzwungen: Weil die Bluttat das Überraschungsmoment zerstört, zieht das Oberkommando den Angriff zwei Stunden vor.


Minimalismus bei Sanktionen: Der verantwortliche Offizier wird entlassen, der Brigadechef erhält lediglich einen Verweis; ob Militärjuristen ein Strafverfahren eröffnen, ist offen.


Posthume Etiketten: Die Armee erklärt sechs der Getöteten nachträglich zu Hamas-Angehörigen – Belege legt sie nicht vor.
 
Zurück
Top Bottom