Katana
L20: Enlightened
muss die PS4 vertikal auch skalieren oder sind das dann schon die balken?
Im folgenden Video siehst du, wie du consolewars als Web-App auf dem Startbildschirm deines Smartphones installieren kannst.
Hinweis: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
muss die PS4 vertikal auch skalieren oder sind das dann schon die balken?
Willst du wirklich wissen wie weak die Weakbox ist? Dann klick auf den nächsten Spoilerkastern :v:
1920x768 resolution on PlayStation 4 and a meagre 1600x640 on Xbox One.What's worse, on Xbox One, it almost feels as if the renderer is out of sync with the game simulationAs it stands the results aren't looking great for either console but the PS4 version takes the lead for the moment with its higher resolution and smoother update when running at 30fps.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-the-evil-within-performance-analysis
Was fürt ne Technikgurke. :v:
komisch, du hast den text ausgelassen der besagt dass an manchen stellen die box besser performt.
To illustrate the issue, right-click, save as, and download this Xbox One clip, and compare it with this matched PlayStation 4 clip. Both games are rendering at a locked 30fps, but something's clearly very wrong with the Xbox One build. Looking at the numbers alone suggests that both versions produce similar performance metrics with some scenes even operating a touch smoother on Xbox One but, in practice, the Microsoft version feels worse,
Crytek 'open' to bringing Ryse to PS4
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=912815
Müssen sie wirklich nicht machen
Die halbe stunde am PC hat mir gereichtaber ein mega AA hat das game am PC.
Wurde hier glaube ich schon mal gepostet.
http://www.worldsfactory.net/2014/10/15/ps4-gpgpu-doubles-xb1-gpgpu-ubisoft-test
Da was da steht passt aber nicht mit dem ACU 900P Bullshit zusammen.
Assassin’s Creed Dev Gives Unofficial Response on 900p Resolution
It seems that no matter how hard they try, Ubisoft can’t seem to get away from the controversy surrounding the 900p resolution of Assassin’s Creed Unity.
An anonymous employee from Ubisoft sent out an email unofficially addressing the controversy that has surrounded Unity‘s resolution on Xbox One and PS4. He was willing to provide his position as verification, though we are still chasing confirmation. We will update as soon as new information becomes available.
Below is an approximate transcription of his quote (beware of language):
I’m happy to enlighten you guys because way too much bullshit about 1080p making a difference is being thrown around. If the game is as pretty and fun as ours will be, who cares? Getting this game to 900p was a BITCH. The game is so huge in terms of rendering that it took months to get it to 720p at 30fps. The game was 9fps 9 months ago. We only achieved 900p at 30fps weeks ago. The PS4 couldn’t handle 1080p 30fps for our game, whatever people, or Sony and Microsoft say. Yes, we have a deal with Microsoft, and yes we don’t want people fighting over it, but with all the recent concessions from Microsoft, backing out of CPU reservations not once, but twice, you’re talking about a 1 or 2 fps difference between the two consoles. So yes, locking the framerate is a conscious decision to keep people bullshiting, but that doesn’t seem to have worked in the end.
Even if Ubi has deals, the dev team members are proud, and want the best performance out of every console out there. What’s hard is not getting the game to render at this point, it’s making everything else in the game work at the same level of performance we designed from the start for the graphics. By the amount of content and NPCs in the game, from someone who witnessed optimization for lots of Ubisoft games in the past, this is crazily optimized for such a young generation of consoles. This really is about to define a next gen like no other game before. Mordor has next gen system and gameplay, but not graphics like Unity does. The proof comes in that game being cross gen. Our producer (Vincent) saying we’re bound with AI by the CPU is right, but not entirely. Consider this, they started this game so early for next gen, MS and Sony wanted to push graphics first, so that’s what we did. I believe 50% of the CPU is dedicated to helping the rendering by processing pre-packaged information, and in our case, much like Unreal 4, baked global illumination lighting. The result is amazing graphically, the depth of field and lighting effects are beyond anything you’ve seen on the market, and even may surpass Infamous and others. Because of this I think the build is a full 50gigs, filling the blu-ray to the edge, and nearly half of that is lighting data.
was mir nicht in den Kopf geht ist folgendes
Watch Dogs auf X1 = 792p
Watch Dogs auf PS4 = 900p
ACU auf X1 = 900p
ACU auf PS4 = 900p
man hat es also für die X1 geschafft die Auflösung auf 900p zu bringen bei ACU im Vergleich zu Watch Dogs, aber bei der PS4 ist keine Steigerung drin?
da können die Ubi Leute erzählen was sie wollen, das leuchtet mir einfach nicht ein
ja, wurde schon besprochen, dennoch immer noch interessant, dass die PS4 GPU fast 100% über der X1 GPU liegt bei dieser Anwendung, obwohl die reine Rohleistung nicht mal 50% höher ist
Die Bandbreite könnte und wird der Grund sein.
Guerrilla Cambridge’s New PS4 Exclusive Will Use Physically Based Shaders with High Visual Standard
Um wie viel?Ja? Die hätten ruhig die CPU höher takten können![]()
Um wie viel?
Damit es merklich was bringt, hast du auch wieder Kopfweh mit der Kühlung und der Lautstärke.
Dann musst du wieder neue Kompromisse eingehen.